I can relate to the database being the new and improved narrative structure. In most types of databases, key words are used to link one like category to the next. Like the example we used in class, Wikipedia, key words are hyper linked to other pages that once taken out of context have no actual relation to the original topic that was being viewed. I think a lot of our minds work this way. For example, I'll be thinking about something then seeing a certain color will trigger another thought in my mind that seemingly could be linked to what i was originally thinking about, even though one thought being linked to the other is completely random, it does relate in concordance to memory. This idea reminds me of tree diagrams we used to have to draw in elementary school. One key word would stem many ideas that would ultimately have stemmed from one key concept.

However, in the grand scheme of things, to effectively communicate a feeling or idea to others, it is key for us as a society to be able to keep with the traditional structure of narrative. There is more of a reward for us in the end. Clicking around someones flickr account sure is fun but not really so helpful in concocting an actual narrative about the person who owns the particular flickr.

I think I'm also having a hard time differentiating the two things because in reality they are both quite different from one another. They work together well if you know how to use both forms of media in the right way. Like for example reading a book then writing a critique on a blog for others to read and engage.

One thing is for sure: Databases have made doing research and essentially the whole college experience a lot more bearable.